Cost-effective lazy-forward
WebLeskovec et.al. first build up a method called Cost-Effective lazy Forward (CELF) for the BIM, which uses the submod-ularity property to speed up the algorithm and it is much … WebApr 2, 2024 · seed sets. Leskovec et al. [28] proposed cost-effective lazy forward selection (CELF), which, according to the sub-modularity of the influence maximization objective, achieves near-optimal placements. Chen et al. proposed the NewGreedyIC algorithm, which can decrease the time costs and optimize the diffusion of influence [23].
Cost-effective lazy-forward
Did you know?
Webimport heapq def celf (graph, k, prob, n_iters = 1000): """ Find k nodes with the largest spread (determined by IC) from a igraph graph using the Cost Effective Lazy Forward … WebJul 13, 2024 · Experimental results on ten real-world networks demonstrate that the proposed algorithm SSR-PEA can achieve 98 $\%$ of the influence spread achieved by …
WebJul 28, 2024 · The experimental results on the two real datasets of Slashdot and Epinions show that D-RIS algorithm is close to the CELF (cost-effective lazy-forward) algorithm … WebLeskovec et al. [3] adopt a lazy-greedy submodular maximization approach called CELF (Cost-Effective Lazy Forward). In this approach, by making use of the submodu-lar nature of the reachability objective function, they save on additional computations of the marginal gain [6] that do not contribute to the selection of the top node as the iterations
WebMar 18, 2024 · Furthermore, the Cost-Effective Lazy Forward (CELF) strategy is used to accelerate the process of selecting the influential nodes, which avoids a large amount of … Webet al. present an optimization in selecting new seeds, which is referred to as the “Cost-Effective Lazy Forward” (CELF) scheme. The CELF optimization uses the submodularity property of the influence maximization objective to greatly reduce the number of evaluations on the influence spread of vertices.
WebSep 7, 2024 · Cost Effective Lazy Forward (CELF) Algorithm. The CELF algorithm was developed by Leskovec et al. (2007). Although the Greedy algorithm is much quicker than solving the full problem, it is still very slow …
Web: reward , cost : reward , cost ; Then the benefit ratios for the first selection are: 2 and 1, respectively; This algorithm will pick and then cannot afford , resulting in an arbitrarily … jsレネップWebseeds, which was referred to as the "Cost-Effective Lazy Forward" (CELF) scheme. The CELF optimization used the submodularity property. Chen et al. proposed a scalable heuristic called LDAG for the LT model [6]. They constructed local directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) for each node and considered influence only within it. adozione in bulgariaWebMar 25, 2024 · Centrality measures help to identify the influential node in the network. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the Influence Maximization techniques viz., Heuristic Algorithm (HA), Greedy Algorithm (GA), Cost Effective Lazy Forward (CELF) ++ Algorithm, and Discrete Shuffled Frog-Leaping Algorithm (DSFLA). js ログイン画面WebCost-effective definition, producing optimum results for the expenditure. See more. adozione gatto sphynx adultoWebNov 21, 2024 · Leskovec et al. proposed an approach named cost-effective lazy forward (CELF), which is 700 times more efficient than the greedy algorithm. CELF uses diminishing returns property of a sub-modular function of cascade influence. adozione gay dibattitoWebalgorithms have been proposed. Leskovec et al. [5] proposed a lazy greedy algorithm Cost-Effective Lazy Forward (CELF) by mining the submodeling of the influence functionwhich greatly reduced the number of simulations to evaluate the , seed influence range. The experiment shows that the CELF algorithm is 700 times faster than the greedy algorithm. adozione giuridicaWebCost-Effective Lazy Forward (CELF) optimization that reduces the computation cost of the influence spread using sub-modularity property of the objective function. Chen et al. [4] … adozione in india forum